Legal Opinion

Simons v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 21, 1994No. 9110-06965; CA A78970PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendants James and Elizabeth Bauer (Bauers) appeal from a judgment dismissing their cross-claims against defendant City of Portland (city) and granting city’s motion for indemnity against the Bauers. We reverse.

Bauers own property on Southeast 62nd Avenue in Portland, at the intersection of 62nd and southeast Harold streets. At that corner, adjacent to Bauers’ property, city has placed a stop sign for southbound traffic on 62nd. On June 20, 1990, decedent was driving south on 62nd, when she entered the intersection without stopping at the stop sign and hit a car that was traveling west on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. Barrett & Associates, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Whinston v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. City of Portland v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Beaver v. PelettOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Henderson-Rubio v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc. v. American Office Products, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2001
  2. Knepper v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API