Brooks v. Austin Berryhill Fabricators, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Respondent brings forth five assignments of error. First, respondent contends that the trial court erred in holding that the Review Board’s decision did not prejudice its substantial rights. Second, respondent contends that the trial court erred in affirming the Review Board’s decision as to the impossibility defense since the Review Board’s decision was based on an error of law. Third, respondent contends that based on the entire record the trial court erred in affirming the Review Board’s decision. Fourth, respondent contends that the trial court erred in affirming the Review…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lackey v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Faultless Division, Bliss & Laughlin Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. Secretary of Labor, and Occupational Safety and Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor v. Dun-Par Engineered Form Company, and Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Cincinnati Butchers Supply Co. v. ConolySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- In Re the Appeal of K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.