State v. Roe
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Barry Roe appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of gross sexual imposition. We affirm the judgment, concluding the district court did not err in admitting child hearsay statements as part of a stipulation. We also conclude there was sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions and the prosecutor did not commit misconduct during closing argument.
I
[¶ 2] The State charged Roe with two counts of willfully engaging in sexual contact with two minor children, K.V. and N.V. The children were both under the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend HofstadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Daniel Lewis Lee, Also Known as Daniel Lewis Graham, Also Known as D L Graham, Also Known as Danny LeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- State v. SchimmelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. KrullNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ShawNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. RatliffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. LangNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. CampbellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. WallitschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.