Legal Opinion

State v. Roe

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 2014No. 20130326PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Barry Roe appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of gross sexual imposition. We affirm the judgment, concluding the district court did not err in admitting child hearsay statements as part of a stipulation. We also conclude there was sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions and the prosecutor did not commit misconduct during closing argument.

I

[¶ 2] The State charged Roe with two counts of willfully engaging in sexual contact with two minor children, K.V. and N.V. The children were both under the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend HofstadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Daniel Lewis Lee, Also Known as Daniel Lewis Graham, Also Known as D L Graham, Also Known as Danny LeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  3. State v. SchimmelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. KrullNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ShawNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. RatliffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. LangNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. CampbellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. WallitschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API