Legal Opinion

State v. Lang

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2015No. 20140332PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Dallas Lang appeals after a jury found him guilty of felonious restraint. He argues that because a juror allegedly made inappropriate comments during jury selection, the district court should not have denied his motion, made later, for a mistrial. He also argues the district court should have given a curative instruction to the jury to disregard the statements made during jury selection. Because the district court neither abused its discretion in denying Lang’s motion for mistrial nor committed obvious error by not giving a curative instruction to the jury, we affirm…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. SmallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. William MACH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry STEWART; Grant Woods, Attorney General, Respondents-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. State v. HernandezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. KloseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. DopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. RendeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. BlotskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. WallitschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. GlickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API