Legal Opinion
Kaufman v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 24, 1989No. 88 Civ. 5124 (RJW)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have challenged the laws and regulations enacted and administered by defendants regarding asbestos removal or encapsulation during building alteration, renovation, or demolition work on the grounds that these laws and regulations, inter alia, violate substantive due process, procedural due process and constitute a taking without just compensation under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs also assert several pendent state law claims. Defendants have moved to dismiss the federal claims in the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Interport Pilots Agency, Inc. v. SammisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Interport Pilots Agency, Inc. v. SammisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Southview Associates, Ltd. v. BongartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Wolf v. 2539 Realty AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- 1766-68 Associates, LP v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.