Legal Opinion

United States v. Perko

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 26, 1955No. Civ. 1616PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for a temporary injunction restraining and prohibiting the defendants, and each of them, and their servants, employees, representatives and agents from trespassing upon and from aiding, abetting, inducing, procuring and causing others to trespass upon the premises of the plaintiff; from cutting trees, timber, brush or plants upon said premises; from removing any of the soil or gravel from any part of said premises to any other part thereof; from otherwise disturbing the natural character of said premises; from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal. v. Young's Market Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Indianapolis Brewing Co. v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. City of St. Paul v. DalsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MacKie v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1961
  2. Izaak Walton League of America v. St. ClairDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
  3. United States v. PerkoDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1956
  4. Bydlon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  5. Bydlon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API