Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bydlon v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 15, 1959No. 421-55, 480-55Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

WHITAKER, Judge,

dissenting in part and concurring in part, in which District Judge ALBERT Y. BRYAN (sitting by designation) joins:

The per curiam opinion of the majority adopts the opinion of the Trial Commissioner with certain modifications. That opinion determines the right to compensation of the plaintiffs who owned resorts within the area upon whether or not they had a way of necessity through *892the air space over the Superior National Forest in order to reach their properties. The Commissioner concluded that plaintiffs Zupancich and Skala did have such a way of necessity, but that…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API