Legal Opinion

Evaristo Javier Sanchez v. Hope v. Rose

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 10, 2020No. 36279-5Published

1Opinion of the Court

FILED MARCH 10, 2020 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE EVARISTO JAVIER SANCHEZ, ) No. 36279-5-III ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) PUBLISHED OPINION ) HOPE V. ROSE, ) ) Respondent. ) PENNELL, A.C.J. — Washington’s judges have statutory authority to control their courtrooms by summarily sanctioning individuals for direct contempt. This is an awesome power, carrying the potential for incarceration and fines with few procedural protections. As such, it must be exercised with restraint. Summary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mead School District No. 354 v. Mead Education Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. WinthropWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. In Re Dependency of AKWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In re the Dependency of A.K.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In Re the Marriage of NielsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API