In re the Dependency of A.K.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Alexander, C.J.
Petitioners M.H.-O. and Y.H. are teenage girls who ran away multiple times from foster *638homes in which they had been placed. The juvenile court found each of them in contempt of court for running away and used its “inherent contempt power” to order each of them to spend 30 to 60 days in detention. Petitioners ask this court to reverse the Court of Appeals decision affirming the juvenile court orders. They argue that the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that the juvenile court has the inherent power to impose punitive sanctions on a youth for indirect contempt. Although we…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In re the Interest of SilvaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re SilvaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Vergeson v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Vergeson v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.