Legal Opinion

Advanced Building Maintenance v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1996No. B091617PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NOTT, J.

Appellant State Compensation Insurance Fund appeals from an order entered after the trial court granted respondent Advanced Building Maintenance’s motion to vacate a judgment. We reverse.

Contentions

Appellant urges that (1) respondent’s motion to vacate the judgment was untimely and the trial court lacked jurisdiction to extend the statutory deadline, (2) the trial court’s order granting the motion to vacate the judgment was void because it failed to enter a different judgment, and (3) respondent did not provide the trial court with any other basis for vacating the judgment.

Facts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hanooka v. PivkoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. P. W. Stephens, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Tricor California, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pittman v. Beck Park Apartments Ltd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Garibotti v. HinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Arambula v. Union Carbide Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Conservatorship of the Person & Estate of TownsendCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Hu v. Silgan Containers Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API