Legal Opinion

Anderson v. American National Property and Casualty Company

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided October 3, 2019No. 1:17-cv-03016Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 17–cv–03016–KMT BETHANY ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Under Federal Rule of Procedure 11(b), for every pleading, motion, or other paper presented to the court, an attorney must certify, to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief, formed after a reasonable inquiry, (1) that he isn’t presenting the filing for any improper purpose, (2) that the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Adamson v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. v. GEICO Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  4. Muathe v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  5. Kisselman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API