Legal Opinion

Reed v. Nashua Buick Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 5, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

Exceptions were taken to the admission of evidence of the absence of other approaches to the hospital and the presence of a “no parking” sign upon the south side of Prospect street; to proof of the custom of the plaintiff and other doctors to park on the north side of said street at particular stands and irrespective of direction; and to evidence that such custom suited their convenience and promoted the prompt performance of their professional duties. It is the position of the defendant in argument that this evidence was inadmissible because the facts sought to be proved were not shown to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. ThomasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  2. Lydston v. Rockingham County Light & Tower Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  3. State v. HauseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  4. Saunders v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  5. Wright v. WoodwardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cyr v. J.I. Case Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  2. Morrison v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  3. Alphonse Napolitano v. Eastern Motor Express, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  4. Bartis v. WarringtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  5. Berounsky v. OgdenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API