Legal Opinion

Merrill v. Wallingford

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 26, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This is a common law action of tort instituted by the plaintiff to retrieve his damages for personal injuries and their consequences, sustained by him whilst working as a mechanic for the defendant. The Workmen’s Compensation Act does not apply since the defendant has but two employees. R. S. (1954), c. 31, § 4; P. L., 1957, c. 343.

At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the defendant moved for a directed verdict. The motion was denied. Defendant excepted to such a ruling and now prosecutes his exceptions.

The plaintiff had complained that the defendant without heed to his duty had…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wormell v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
  2. Jordan v. Portland Coach Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
  3. Shanny v. Androscoggin MillsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1876
  4. Garmong v. HendersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
  5. Weed v. ClarkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hurd v. HurdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Hurd v. HurdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Smith v. DrinkwaterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API