Merrill v. Wallingford
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
This is a common law action of tort instituted by the plaintiff to retrieve his damages for personal injuries and their consequences, sustained by him whilst working as a mechanic for the defendant. The Workmen’s Compensation Act does not apply since the defendant has but two employees. R. S. (1954), c. 31, § 4; P. L., 1957, c. 343.
At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the defendant moved for a directed verdict. The motion was denied. Defendant excepted to such a ruling and now prosecutes his exceptions.
The plaintiff had complained that the defendant without heed to his duty had…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wormell v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
- Jordan v. Portland Coach Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Shanny v. Androscoggin MillsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1876
- Garmong v. HendersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
- Weed v. ClarkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hurd v. HurdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Hurd v. HurdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Smith v. DrinkwaterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962