Legal Opinion
Hurd v. Hurd
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 2, 1981Published
1Opinion of the Court
423 A.2d 960 (1981)
Richard HURD
v.
Daniel HURD, Sr. and Clark Equipment Company.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Argued November 3, 1980.
Decided January 2, 1981.
Jerome S. Goldsmith (orally), Michael L. Rair, Law Student, Bangor, for plaintiff.
Rudman, Winchell, Carter & Buckley, Clark P. Thompson (orally), Michael P. Friedman, Bangor, for Clark Equipment Co.
Vafiades, Brountas & Kominsky, Eugene Coughlin, Bangor (orally), for Daniel Hurd.
Before McKUSICK, C. J., and WERNICK, GODFREY, NICHOLS, and GLASSMAN, JJ., and DUFRESNE, A. R. J.
McKUSICK, Chief Justice.
In this negligence and breach of warranty…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Wing v. MorseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Wallace v. Coca-Cola Bottling Plants, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Flaherty v. HelfontSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.