Legal Opinion

State v. Reingold

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 15, 1980No. 18-935 (79-916), CA 17586PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction of Theft in the First Degree by receiving stolen property. He contends on appeal that the trial court erred in allowing the person from whom the defendant bought the stolen property to be brought into court in prison garb and restraints for the purpose of identification, and that the court further erred in allowing testimony regarding other crimes committed by that person. We agree and reverse.

Defendant was charged with Theft in the First Degree by receiving stolen property after rings which had been stolen from a Milwaukie jewelry store were found in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ManriqueOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. Van HooserOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. KristichOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State v. ZimmerleeOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. HarrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API