People v. Brooks
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
We do not find error in the admission into evidence of declarant’s responses as excited utterances. The record clearly demonstrates that the statements were made before there was " 'time to contrive and misrepresent, i.e., while the nervous excitement may be supposed still to dominate and the reflective powers to be yet in abeyance’ ” (People v Brown, 70 NY2d 513, 518, quoting People v Marks, 6 NY2d 67, 72). Declarant was critically wounded by the shotgun blast, physically and emotionally traumatized by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. MarksNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by50 opinions
- People v. VasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. CottoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. BierenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. GreavesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.