Legal Opinion
United States v. Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided October 28, 1986No. CA 3-80-1671-RPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BUCHMEYER, District Judge.
This opinion concerns serious violations of almost every prohibition in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692. 1 It constitutes this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law under Rule 52(a), Fed.R.Civ.P.
1. Introduction
The government charges that the defendant, Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc. (“CAB”), has consistently and repeatedly violated the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692. The defendant denies these charges.
Two trials were held. The first was limited to evidence concerning the defendant’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Diane Jeter v. Credit Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Ken Baker v. G. C. Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Federal Trade Commission v. Kitco of Nevada, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Fall River Motor Sales, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Beattie v. D.M. Collections, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- Amanda Horkey v. J.V.D.B. & Associates, Inc., an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Arteaga v. Asset Acceptance, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Johnson v. Statewide Collections, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.