Legal Opinion
Lang v. Shofner
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 5, 1943No. 2422PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRISSOM, Justice.
Nuell Shofner and wife sued C. M. Lang-, a common carrier, for damages resulting from the loss of an interstate shipment. Lang impleaded Sunset Motor Lines, his connecting carrier, and Sunset Motor Lines impleaded Texas-Arizona Motor Freight, its connecting carrier. The cause was tried to the court. Judgment was rendered for plaintiffs against Lang for $350, and Lang was denied judgment over against the other carriers. Lang has appealed.
Appellees have not filed briefs. There are no findings of fact or conclusions of law. Appellant, in his point 4, contends there is no…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Union Pacific Railroad v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Turner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Shroyer v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1920
- Shroyer v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. HamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Odom v. Pacific Northern Airlines, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Texas-Arizona Motor Freight, Inc. v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959