Legal Opinion

Stephens v. . Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1912PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At the close of plaintiff's evidence, on motion, there was judgment of nonsuit, and plaintiff excepted and appealed.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by MR. JUSTICE HOKE. Plaintiff, a witness in support of his demand, testified in effect as follows: That in November or December of 1907, a short while after the panic, he was an employee of defendant company, and in charge of a logging squad in connection with the plant of said company at Oriental, N.C. That the superintendent of defendant plant at that place was one W. J. Moore, in general charge of same, having…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Western National Bank v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Bank v. Hay.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. First National Bank v. Charles Nelson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1868
  4. Craig Silver Co. v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. Phillips v. . HookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1867

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fisher v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Fisher v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Jones v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Johnson v. Shook & Fletcher Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Babicora Development Co. v. EdelmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API