Legal Opinion

Ballard v. State, Motor Vehicle Division

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1979No. 15863PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Plaintiff appeals from a trial de novo in the district court in which the court affirmed the revocation of plaintiff’s driving privileges by defendant Utah State Motor Vehicle Division. Plaintiff contends before us that the revocation proceedings are quasi-criminal in nature, and that protections afforded a defendant in a criminal prosecution were lacking here. Plaintiff also asserts the implied consent statute 1 constitutes an unconstitutional denial of due process. We affirm the district court. All statutory references are to Utah Code Ann., 1953 as amended.

On September 19,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Severson v. SueppelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. Prucha v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Blow v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Price v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. State, Department of Motor Vehicles v. VezerisNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Kehl v. SchwendimanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  4. Garcia v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. ArbonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API