Legal Opinion
State, Department of Motor Vehicles v. Vezeris
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 1986No. 16841, 16879 and 16886PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The resolution of this consolidation of three appeals rests upon the proper interpretation of NRS 50.325. Because we have concluded that the district courts erred in determining that NRS 50.325 is applicable to administrative proceedings, we reverse the decisions of the district courts.
THE FACTS
The facts in these three cases are the same or similar in many instances. Each respondent was arrested in Clark County during the latter part of 1984 for driving while under the influence of alcohol. After arrest, each respondent elected to submit to a blood test in order to determine his blood…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- McDonnell v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by35 opinions
- Beazer Homes Nevada, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Executive Management, Ltd. v. Ticor Title InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- County of Clark Ex Rel. University Medical Center v. UpchurchNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Las Vegas v. WalshNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Salas v. Allstate Rent-A-Car, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.