Legal Opinion
White Ex Rel. Estate of Bournakel v. Sabatino
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided March 24, 2006No. Civ. 04-00500 ACK/LEK, 05-00025 ACK/LEKPublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING LIMITATION PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KAY, Senior District Judge.
BACKGROUND
The Court issued an Order Denying Defendant Ronald Wallach’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying Limitation Plaintiff 3090, Incorporated’s Claim that Plaintiff Lacks Standing to File a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and Granting Plaintiff Sarah White’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on February 9, 2006 (“Feb. 9 Order”). The Order outlines the factual and procedural history in this case up to that point and does not…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Carroll v. NakataniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Navajo Nation v. James W. Norris Gayle Norris v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation, Plaintiff-Intervenor. Navajo Nation v. James W. Norris Gayle Norris v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation, Plaintiff-Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Abbey v. HAWAII EMPLOYERS MUT. INS. CO.(HEMIC)District Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Wereb v. Maui CountyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Pacific Stock, Inc. v. Pearson Education, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
- Hele Ku KB, LLC v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Barnes v. Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.