Legal Opinion
Christy Orr v. Joseph Orr, et al.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 9, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00095Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTY ORR., Plaintiff, Case No. 2:26-cv-95 v. District Judge Edmund A. Sargus Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson JOSEPH ORR, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND REPORT & RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Undersigned for consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1), and the initial screen of her Amended Complaint (Doc. 4) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1) is GRANTED. All judicial officers who render services in this action…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.