Legal Opinion
North American Creamery Co. v. Willcuts
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 21, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOLYNEAUX, District Judge.
Trial by jury was duly waived by written agreement of the parties duly filed with the clerk of this court, and the ease was tried to the court on the 18th day of November, 1929.
Findings of Fact.
I find the following facts:(1) North American Creamery Company is, and at all times hereinafter mentioned was, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the state of Minnesota, doing business as a creamery company, and having its office and principal place of business at Paynesville, Minn.(2) The defendant was in the year 1921, and ever since that- time has…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Beers Ex Rel. Platenius v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Lynch v. HornbySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Bowers v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sablowsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Salt Lake County v. Utah Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. Southern Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Mankato Citizens Telephone Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Phipps v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.