Brown's "Shamrock" Linens, Ltd. v. Bowers
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of Great Britain, and during the year 1918 it was engaged in the business of importing and selling in the United States linens and other textiles. Being a foreign corporation, the assessment of its war profits and excess profits tax was required, by section 327(b) of the Revenue Act .of 1918, to be computed by the Commissioner in accordance with section 328 (40 Stat. 1093). That section reads in part as follows:
“Sec. 328. (a) In the cases specified in section 327 the tax shall be the amount which bears the same ratio…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blair v. Oesterlein MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Cramer & King Co. v. Com'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
- Clinton Iron & Steel Co. v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
- Chicago Frog & Switch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Welch v. St. Helens Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Diamond Alkali Co. v. HeinerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
- Joseph Joseph & Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934