Legal Opinion

Lewers & Cooke, Ltd. v. Redhouse

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1902PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Second District Magistrate, Honolulu.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C. J.

Several questions are raised on tbis appeal on points of law from the District Magistrate.

1. That the Magistrate was without jurisdiction to try the case for the reason that the 7th Amendment to- thfe Federal Constitution confers the right of trial by jury in suits at common law where the value in controversy exceeds twenty dollars, and that in this case such value did exceed such amount and that there is no jury in the District Court. This constitutional provision is sufficiently complied with if, as is the ease here, a trial by jury is allowed on appeal to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Secor v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Union Railroad & Transportation Co. v. TraubeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  4. Reformed Protestant Dutch Church of Westfield v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Corby v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Schoening v. MinerHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Territory of Hawaii ex rel. Rivenburgh v. CorreaHawaii Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Territory v. FieldHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Bottomley v. HallHawaii Supreme Court · 1907
  5. John Ii Estate, Ltd. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API