Legal Opinion
Swift & Company v. United States of America and Orville L. Freeman, Secretary of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 22, 1963No. 13751_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILEY, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition to review and set aside an order of the Agriculture Department’s Judicial Officer 1 requiring Swift & Company to cease and desist from certain selling and marketing practices in violation of §§ 202(a) and (b) of the Packers and Stockyards Act. 2 7 U.S. C. §§ 192(a) and (b).
The issue before the Judicial Officer was whether Swift & Company had sold “picnic hams” to Kroger Company in Nashville, Tennessee, at prices substantially lower than prices charged by Swift to Kroger’s competitors in the Nashville area. The administrative proceeding resulted in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federal Trade Commission v. National Lead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Federal Trade Commission v. Henry Broch & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bratt v. Western Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- E. B. Muller & Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Armour and Company v. United States of America and Orville L. Freeman, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Dale Van Wyk and Van's Livestock, Inc. v. Robert Bergland, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- McClure v. E. A. Blackshere Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1964
- Guenther v. MoreheadDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1967
- Fairbank v. HardinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.