Legal Opinion
Goodman v. Port Authority
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 29, 2012No. 10 Civ. 8352PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant FJC Security Services Inc. (“FJC”) has moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint of plaintiff Vincent Goodman (“Goodman” or “Plaintiff’) and the cross-claims of the defendants The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation, Martha Gulick (“Gulick”), and Donald Párente (“Párente”) (collectively, the “Port Authority Defendants”) pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant Summit Security Services, Inc. (“Summit”) has moved to dismiss Plaintiffs claims against it pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6)…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Greg Landers v. Quality Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Dechberry v. New York City Fire DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Chime v. Peak Security Plus, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Pacific M. International Corp. v. Raman International Gems, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Johnson v. Carlo Lizza & Sons Paving, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.