Legal Opinion

Kyncl v. Kenosha County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1968PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issue is whether Kenosha county was a party to the condemnation award within the meaning of sec. 32.05 (9), Stats., so that service on the county was sufficient to give the court jurisdiction over the necessary parties.

When land is needed for state trunk highway improvement the state highway commission may provide for its acquisition under sec. 84.09, Stats. Sub. (1) provides that the commission may take the necessary action to acquire the land and, if it does, title to the land shall be taken in the name of the state. By virtue of sub. (3) (a) the commission may order that all or part of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bare v. SchinzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Young v. Juneau CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. City of Madison v. Hyland, Hall & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. RosenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Brown County v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Jeanine B. Ex Rel. Blondis v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995
  5. State Department of Transportation v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API