State ex rel. Bare v. Schinz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler., J.
The technical distinctions between a municipal corporation and a county, sometimes designated as a ^aif-municipal corporation, have not at all times been observed by text-writers and by courts; and this failure to so distinguish is also made manifest in the constitution of our state. It is unfortunate that this is so, because much uncertainty, litigation, and expense could have been avoided if the fundamental distinctions between these classes of public bodies had at all times been clearly kept in mind and given full recognition. The distinctions between a municipal corporation proper and a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex rel. McGrael v. PhelpsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Rippe v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Lund v. Chippewa CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Sonneborn v. SylvesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Columbia County v. Board of Trustees of Wisconsin Retirement FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- County of Bergen v. Port of New York AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Jeanine B. Ex Rel. Blondis v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.