Legal Opinion

Timmons v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided January 19, 1999No. 3:97-cv-00224PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HEYBURN, District Judge.

The Court now discusses Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Claim for Punitive Damages and its subsequent motion for directed verdict on the issue of punitive damages. 1 The first motion requires the Court to determine whether the Kentucky Civil Rights Act bars a plaintiff from seeking punitive damages. Because no Kentucky case directly answers this question, the Court must predict how the Kentucky courts would resolve the question. See Hines v. Joy Mfg. Co., 850 F.2d 1146, 1150 (6th Cir.1988). Though the Court concludes that Plaintiff may…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Meyers v. Chapman Printing Co., Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Grzyb v. EvansKentucky Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grego v. Meijer, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2002
  2. Barton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2001
  3. Layne v. Huish Detergents, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Childress v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
  5. Mortland v. Jay Hari LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API