Timmons v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HEYBURN, District Judge.
The Court now discusses Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Claim for Punitive Damages and its subsequent motion for directed verdict on the issue of punitive damages. 1 The first motion requires the Court to determine whether the Kentucky Civil Rights Act bars a plaintiff from seeking punitive damages. Because no Kentucky case directly answers this question, the Court must predict how the Kentucky courts would resolve the question. See Hines v. Joy Mfg. Co., 850 F.2d 1146, 1150 (6th Cir.1988). Though the Court concludes that Plaintiff may…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Meyers v. Chapman Printing Co., Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Grzyb v. EvansKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grego v. Meijer, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2002
- Barton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2001
- Layne v. Huish Detergents, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Childress v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
- Mortland v. Jay Hari LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025