Legal Opinion

Maryland National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Crawford

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 6, 1984No. 894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALPERT, Judge.

The principal issue presented in this case is whether an employer engages in unlawful employment practices 1 proscribed by state and federal civil rights laws by failing to *281comply with the strictures of its own affirmative action plan. This case also requires our consideration of whether exhaustion of State administrative and statutory remedies is a prerequisite prior to bringing an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a Federal statute permitting civil actions for alleged deprivations of constitutional or statutory rights.2

FACTS

The following facts may be gleaned from the pleadings…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dent v. SimmonsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. McConnell v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  3. Long v. RothbaumCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Md.-Nat'l Cap. P. & P. Comm'n v. CrawfordCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API