Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. Adult Parole Auth., 07-Ca-88 (1-17-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 2008No. 07-CA-88PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Relator has filed a complaint requesting this Court issue a writ of mandamus compelling the Adult Parole Authority to grant credit to Relator for "productive participation in institutional programs pursuant to O.R.C. Section 2967.193." Respondent has filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings suggesting it is not the proper party in this case.

{¶ 2} To be entitled to the issuance of a writ of mandamus, relator must demonstrate: (1) a clear legal right to the relief prayed for; (2) a clear legal duty on the respondent's part to perform the act; and, (3) that there exists no plain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. National City Bank v. Board of Education of Cleveland City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Pincelli v. Ohio Bridge Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State ex rel. Woods v. Oak Hill Community Medical Center, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. DeverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CaputoOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. DickersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API