State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. Adult Parole Auth., 07-Ca-88 (1-17-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Relator has filed a complaint requesting this Court issue a writ of mandamus compelling the Adult Parole Authority to grant credit to Relator for "productive participation in institutional programs pursuant to O.R.C. Section 2967.193." Respondent has filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings suggesting it is not the proper party in this case.
{¶ 2} To be entitled to the issuance of a writ of mandamus, relator must demonstrate: (1) a clear legal right to the relief prayed for; (2) a clear legal duty on the respondent's part to perform the act; and, (3) that there exists no plain…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. National City Bank v. Board of Education of Cleveland City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Pincelli v. Ohio Bridge Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
- State ex rel. Woods v. Oak Hill Community Medical Center, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. DeverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. CaputoOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. DickersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2025