Legal Opinion

State v. Snowden

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1975No. 7410SC981PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

It is not necessary for the trial judge to state or explain his reasons for the degree of punishment imposed in a particular case. If the punishment is within lawful limits there is a presumption that the judgment and sentence are regular and valid. Where, however, the record affirmatively discloses that the sentence was imposed for a cause not within the indictment, the judgment will be vacated and the case remanded for resentencing. State v. Swinney, 271 N.C. 130, 155 S.E. 2d 545. In Swinney, defendant had participated in a drinking party with her husband before fatally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goble v. BoundsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Jernigan v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. SwinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SwimmSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. MacKCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. WilkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. HodgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API