Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. City of Chicago v. Chicago City Railway Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1926No. 17833. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

This appeal is from the decision of the circuit court of Cook county dismissing the petition of the city of Chicago in which it asked that a writ of mandamus issue directing the Chicago City Railway Company to remove its tracks and trolley poles from their existing location in Twenty-second street between Archer avenue and Michigan avenue and re-locate them in the same street to conform to the center line of said street as and when widened.

Twenty-second street is an east and west street in the city of Chicago, 66 feet in width, with a paved roadway of 38 feet. As an aid to the lake front…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Louisville Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. City of Chicago v. O'ConnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Anderson v. FullerSupreme Court of Florida · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Detroit Edison Co. v. Southeastern Michigan Transportation AuthorityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Metropolitan Sanitary District v. Village of RomeovilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API