Legal Opinion

Wilson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 2001No. 99-CF-838PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, Associate Judge.

We are faced with yet another case in which the appellant alleges instructional error because the trial judge failed to define the element of “serious bodily injury” as it appears in our aggravated assault statute, D.C.Code § 22-504.1 (1996); 22-404.01 (2001). 1 Appellant Wesley P. Wilson, Jr. also challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal. We affirm, holding that Mr. Wilson did not properly preserve the instructional error issue; that the trial court did not commit plain error by failing to define “serious bodily injury”; and that the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Perry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Swinton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Frye v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Bolanos v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Beaner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API