Fertig v. State
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL .from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Yuma. Frank Baxter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
Appellant was prosecuted by information charging him with the crime of rape. Upon his arraignment he moved the court to set aside the information on the ground that before the filing thereof the defendant had not been legally committed by a magistrate. The motion to set aside was denied and the trial resulted in the conviction of appellant. In his brief herein he assigns many errors, but we shall consider only the one denying the motion to set aside the information.
An inspection of the records as made up in the preliminary Rearing discloses: That appellant was, on December 9, 1912, hy a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. EvansMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- State v. McGreeveyIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Yaner v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. SingletonArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. BerryArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. BirdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. ColvinArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. MichaelArizona Supreme Court · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.