Legal Opinion
Welch v. Cadre Capital
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 12, 1990No. Civ. H-88-717(AHN)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARTIAL RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS
NEVAS, District Judge.
The three plaintiffs in this case alleging investment fraud purchased interests in May 1984 in a limited partnership known as the “Keystone 84-1 Oil and Gas Drilling Partnership” (“Keystone”). In their six-count complaint, the plaintiffs allege violations of several federal securities statutes, a Connecticut securities statute, and common law. They have sued eight defendants purportedly either directly or peripherally associated with Keystone. Pending are motions to dismiss filed by six defendants; the motions raise a host of…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Welch III v. Cadre CapitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Welch v. Cadre CapitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- In Re Crazy Eddie Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- Varnberg v. MinnickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Rabin v. Fivzar AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.