Legal Opinion
Oatey Co. v. Ips Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 30, 2009No. Case 03-CV-1231PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KATHLEEN McDONALD O’MALLEY, District Judge.
Before the Court are several motions for summary judgment, including Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Invalidity (“Invalidity MSJ”) (Doc. 128), which was filed by the Defendants, IPS Corporation (“IPS”) on January 9, 2009. 1 IPS’s Invalidity MSJ challenges the validity of Plaintiff Oatey Company’s (“Oatey”) patent, U.S. Patent No. 6,148, 850 (“'850 Patent”), on various grounds. For the reasons fully articulated below, IPS’s Invalidity MSJ is GRANTED because the Court finds the '850 Patent invalid on obviousness…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Innotek, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016