Legal Opinion

Hively v. School City of Nappanee

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1929No. 25,732PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The appellant, as a resident taxpayer, brought this action to enjoin the school city of Nappanee, its trustees, and the Nappanee Building Company from entering into a lease contract made under the provisions of Acts 1927, ch. 223, for the construction of a school building. Appellees’ demurrer to appellant’s amended complaint was sustained, and, upon appellant’s refusal to plead further, judgment was rendered against him. The ruling on the demurrer is assigned as error.

The amended complaint alleges: That the building company is an Indiana corporation organized for the purpose of acquiring a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Valparaiso v. GardnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Voss v. Waterloo Water Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. City of South Bend v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Board of Commissioners v. GardnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. State ex rel. Matthews v. ForsytheIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. NixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Bryant v. School Town of Oakland CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Protsman v. Jefferson-Craig Consolidated School Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Jefferson School Township v. Jefferson Township School Building Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State Ex Rel. Nevada Building Authority v. HancockNevada Supreme Court · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API