Legal Opinion

City of South Bend v. Reynolds

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1900No. 19,213PublishedCited by 28 opinions

From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

— Appellee sued appellants, the city of South Bend and James Oliver, to enjoin them from carrying out a contract executed by them, on the ground that the city thereby became indebted beyond the constitutional limit. A demurrer to the answer for want of facts was sustained and judgment rendered in favor of appellee.

It appears from the record that the city of South Bend, on October 18, 1899, was the owner and in possession of certain real estate described in the complaint, which had been purchased and was held for the purpose of erecting thereon a city hall, for the use of the several…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grant v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. City of Laporte v. Gamewell Fire Alarm Telegraph Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Brown v. City of CorrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Cason v. City of LebanonIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Voss v. Waterloo Water Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Ambrozich v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. State Office Bldg. Commission v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Protsman v. Jefferson-Craig Consolidated School Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API