Legal Opinion

Suiter v. Suiter

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1944No. 3667PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK. J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment dismissing the amended petition of defendant-appellant, Francis H. McFarland, after the Court had sustained a demurrer to said amended petition.

Four errors are assigned which may be epitomized as, error in the sustaining of the demurrer to the petition of defendant-appellant, McFarland, and error in sustaining the demurrer to the amended petition of said defendant-appellant. The first error assigned is not well made for two reasons: (1), It is not the subject of appeal in the notice filed by defendant; (2), The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kinnier v. . KinnierNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Ruger v. . HeckelNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Thomas v. LambertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Liesman v. BrookvilleOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Brokaw v. BrokawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shammas v. ShammasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Cvitanovich-Dubie v. Dubie.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Coltun v. ColtunDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Pla v. Cleveland State Univ.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Weill v. WeillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API