Legal Opinion

Liesman v. Brookville

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1940No. 1610PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, J.

The above entitled cause is now being submitted as an error proceeding by reason of plaintiff-appellant’s attempted appeal on questions of law from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Ohio.

In conformity to our custom, we examined -the transcript, of docket and journal entries, together with original papers, to determine whether or not the judgment complained of is a final order through which jurisdiction can be conferred upon this court, under the notice of appeal.

The question being a. jurisdictional one, we make this search regardless of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Suiter v. SuiterOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Davies v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Davish v. ArnOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Baker v. MohlerOhio Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API