Legal Opinion
Daleure v. Kentucky
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided February 9, 2000No. 3:97-cv-00709PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HEYBURN, District Judge.
The Court must now turn to the remaining Defendants’, the Fiscal Courts 1 and the Telephone Companies 2 , motions to dismiss the pending Sherman Act and Section 1988 claims. 3 Defendants contend that Plaintiffs cannot establish the essential elements of a Section 1 Sherman Act claim or a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 equal protection claim and that the filed rate doctrine, state action immunity, primary jurisdiction and the Johnson Act bar all judicial remedies.
In deciding a 12(b)(6) motion, the Court must accept as true all factual allegations made in the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Walton v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Valdez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Pamela Gilmore v. County of Douglas, State of NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- McGuire v. Ameritech Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- In Re Title Insurance Antitrust CasesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.