Totoritus v. Stefan
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtArthur G. Klein, J.
This is a motion by plaintiff for a discovery and inspection of a statement made by plaintiff to defendant’s investigator, the record of the physical examination of the plaintiff by the defendant’s doctor, and the hospital record. The inspection of a party’s own statement to his opponent’s investigator is proper (Urbina v. McLain, 4 A D 2d 589 and cases cited). While in the instant case there was no order directing the physical examination which was held by consent, I find no compelling reason for not adopting the reasoning of Mr. Justice Eder in the case of Kuyamjian v. Murrah (5 Misc 2d…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kuyamjian v. MurrahNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Kleinot v. SteinerNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Tripp v. KnoxNew York Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gooch v. BlanchNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- O'Keefe v. MowNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Baum v. NussenbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Mallon v. GinsbergNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Nadav v. KozlowskiNew York Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.