Baum v. Nussenbaum
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph M. Conroy, J.
Motion by plaintiff for a discovery and inspection of the records and report of a physical examination made of the plaintiff by the defendant’s doctor. The physical examination was had on plaintiff’s consent and without the necessity for a court order.
*475In this Department, it has long been the custom to require a copy of the doctor’s report to be furnished to the party examined where the examination was made pursuant to a court order (Di Salvo v. Di Giacomo, 2 Misc 2d 1068), but not when the examination was granted voluntarily (Andrews v. Ghikas, 278 App. Div. 658). More recently, however,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Totoritus v. StefanNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Andrews v. GhikasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Di Salvo v. Di GiacomoNew York Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by3 opinions
- Otten v. Melbros Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- Chiarani v. ManiscalcoNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Donovan v. Albano Trucking Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959