Legal Opinion

Kuyamjian v. Murrah

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris Eder, J.

Motion by defendant for a physical examination of plaintiff is granted. Plaintiff previously submitted to such an examination by a doctor selected by defendant without the necessity of a court order. That examination revealed a claim of neurological involvement and injury to the ear and defendant made the instant application for a second examination, this time by a neurologist and an ear specialist. Plaintiff does not object but urges the imposition of certain conditions, including the furnishing to her attorney of a duplicate copy of the medical reports.

Section 306 of the Civil Practice Act…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dziwanoski v. Ocean Carriers Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1960
  2. Simon v. CastilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Totoritus v. StefanNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Gooch v. BlanchNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Sorrentino v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API