Legal Opinion

Hester v. Hester

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 10, 1983No. 56020PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

The novel issue presented is whether entitlement to child support is contingent upon visitation with the child. Other questions are: whether orthodontic bills are covered by a provision in the divorce decree that requires the father to pay one-half the doctor bills; and if the trial court erred in requiring the litigants to each pay his/her attorney fees.

Beverly Ann Hester (appellant-mother), the custodial parent, cited Lee James Hester (appellee-father), the noncustodial parent, for contempt for failure to pay child support and one-half of the parties’ child’s orthodontist…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Henson v. MoneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Porter v. PorterOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Wade v. WadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Wagner v. WagnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Merritt v. MerrittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. Broyles v. BroylesWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Root v. KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Adams v. UnterkircherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API