Legal Opinion

Gunter v. Dayco Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1985No. 8410IC1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

The plaintiff in this case was transferred by his employer to new duties that required more strenuous physical activity, different from the activity in his original position. He spent two days working with a training crew learning the new duties before he was injured the next morning. The resolution of this appeal depends on whether the Industrial Commission may find from these facts that the plaintiff was injured in an accident. We hold that the Industrial Commission may.

The term “accident” as used in the Workers’ Compensation Act has been defined as “an unlooked for and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harding v. THOMAS AND HOWARD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Porter v. Shelby Knit, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Searcy v. BransonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Gladson v. Piedmont Stores/Scotties Discount Drug StoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crandall v. Lincoln Med. Ctr.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API