Hickey v. ESTATE OF HICKEY ETC.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKendall, C. J.
Appellee has filed motion to dismiss this appeal, or, in the alternative, to affirm the judg ment, contending that the purported transcript filed in this court is not securely bound in one volume, is not consecutively paged at the bottom thereof, is not completely indexed and contains no marginal notes, all as required by Rule 2-5 of the Supreme Court. Other contentions are presented, but, in view of our decision, it is needless to discuss them. It is apparent that there is not a single bound volume of the transcript before this court, as contemplated by Rule 2-5. There is a bound volume of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tull v. DavidIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
- Reid v. HoustonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Smith v. State ex rel. HamillIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- State v. SutherlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Yeoman v. ShaefferIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Livingston, Admr. v. Livingston, TrusteeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
- Boland v. OverladeIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Marriage of Summers v. SummersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992